HackerX
HomeRank #29
@jaschasd

AI

@jaschasd

View on X
Recommended by 4 HN userstechnical
View on X

Why Hacker News recommends it

5 comments from 4 distinct recommending readers, between 2024 and 2024.

  1. @telotortiumRecommends2024
    Twitter: twitter.com/jaschasd/status/17569302429… ArXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2402.06184 Abstract: "Some fractals -- for instance those associated with the Mandelbrot and quadratic Julia sets -- are computed by iterating a function, and identifying the boundary between hyperparameters for which the resulting series diverges or remains bounded. Neural network training similarly involves iterating an update function (e.g. repeated steps of gradient descent), can result in convergent or divergent behavior, and can be extremely sensitive to small changes in hyperparameters. Motivated by these similarities, we experimentally examine the boundary between neural network hyperparameters that lead to stable and divergent training. We find that this boundary is fractal over more than ten decades of scale in all tested configurations." Contains several cool animations zooming in to show the fractal boundary between convergent and divergent training, just like the classic Mandelbrot and Julia set animations.
    Neural network training makes beautiful fractalsRead the thread
  2. @otaviogoodRecommends2024
    This is much more interesting if you see the animations. x.com/jaschasd/status/17569302429656065…
    The boundary of neural network trainability is fractalRead the thread
  3. @Buttons840Recommends2024
    I'll defend the idea that it was obvious. (Although, it wasn't obvious to me until someone pointed it out, so maybe that's not obvious.) If you watch this video[0], you'll see in the first frame that there is a clear boundary between learning rates that converge or not. Ignoring this paper for a moment, what if we zoom in really really close to that boundary? There are two possibilities, either (1) the boundary is perfectly sharp no matter how closely we inspect it, or (2) it is a little bit fuzzy. Of those two possibilities, the perfectly sharp boundary would be more surprising. [0]: x.com/jaschasd/status/17569302429656065…
    The boundary of neural network trainability is fractalRead the thread
  4. @j_bumRecommends2024
    Link? Sounds fun and reminds me of this tweet [0] [0] x.com/jaschasd/status/17569302429656065…
    Visualizing Attention, a Transformer's Heart [video]Read the thread
  5. @westurnerCites it2024
    x.com/jaschasd/status/17569302476338258… : > So it shouldn't (post-hoc) be a surprise that hyperparameter landscapes are fractal. This is a general phenomenon: in these panes we see fractal hyperparameter landscapes for every neural network configuration I tried, including deep linear networks.
    Visualization of a dense grid search over neural network hyperparametersRead the thread

More

RSS feed

Keyboard shortcuts